THE REASON EARLY HUMANS MAY
HAVE PRACTICED INFANT CANNIBALISM
HAVE PRACTICED INFANT CANNIBALISM
http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com -
The earliest known instance of cannibalism among hominids occurred
roughly 800,000 years ago. The victims, mainly children, may have been
eaten as part of a strategy to defend territories against neighbors,
researchers report online in the Journal of Human Evolution. The new
study shows how anthropologists use the behavior of modern humans and
primates to make inferences about what hominids did in the past - and
demonstrates the limitations of such comparisons. The cannibalism in
question was discovered in the Gran Dolina cave site of Spain’s
Atapuerca Mountains. Eudald Carbonell of the University of Rovira and
Virgili in Spain and colleagues found evidence of butchering on bones
belonging to Homo antecessor, a controversial species that lived in
Europe as early as 1.2 million years ago. Because no other hominid
species has been found in the region at the same time as the butchered
bones, the victims must have been eaten by their own kind, the team
concluded. Today, human cannibalism occurs in a variety of contexts: for
nutritional value (often in times of starvation), as part of funerary
rituals or during warfare.
The different purposes of cannibalism can leave different patterns in the archaeological record. When humans consume other humans for purely dietary reasons, the victims are often treated just like any other prey. This is what the researchers found at Gran Dolina. Eleven individuals were butchered in a manner similar to that of deer and other mammals: Bones had cut marks in areas of muscle attachments and the skulls had signs of defleshing. Thus, H. antecessor appeared to eat its own kind for a nutritional purpose - but probably not because of a food shortage. So why cannibalism? To find an answer, the researchers looked to chimpanzees. That’s because some aspects of H. antecessor cannibalism don’t resemble those of contemporary human cannibalism or cannibalism seen in Neanderthals or early modern humans living 100,000 years ago. For instance, nine of the 11 butchered individuals at Gran Dolina were children or adolescents compared with the largely adult victims of more recent human cannibalism. Young victims is a pattern seen among chimpanzees. When female chimps range alone near the boundary of their territory, males from the neighboring group may kill and eat the females’ infants. Carbonell and his colleagues suggest the best explanation for this behavior is territorial defense and expansion.
The different purposes of cannibalism can leave different patterns in the archaeological record. When humans consume other humans for purely dietary reasons, the victims are often treated just like any other prey. This is what the researchers found at Gran Dolina. Eleven individuals were butchered in a manner similar to that of deer and other mammals: Bones had cut marks in areas of muscle attachments and the skulls had signs of defleshing. Thus, H. antecessor appeared to eat its own kind for a nutritional purpose - but probably not because of a food shortage. So why cannibalism? To find an answer, the researchers looked to chimpanzees. That’s because some aspects of H. antecessor cannibalism don’t resemble those of contemporary human cannibalism or cannibalism seen in Neanderthals or early modern humans living 100,000 years ago. For instance, nine of the 11 butchered individuals at Gran Dolina were children or adolescents compared with the largely adult victims of more recent human cannibalism. Young victims is a pattern seen among chimpanzees. When female chimps range alone near the boundary of their territory, males from the neighboring group may kill and eat the females’ infants. Carbonell and his colleagues suggest the best explanation for this behavior is territorial defense and expansion.
WHAT DO THE VEDIC TEACHINGS TELL US?
Baka,
the mighty Rakshasa, inflamed with wrath, uprooted a lot of trees
hurling them with all his power at the son of Kunti (Bhima). Soon the
forest became treeless and finding no other weapon, Baka ran at Bhima
and seized him with his arms. He dragged Bhima on the ground, and Bhima
also dragged him on the ground. Soon the Rakshasa became fatigued and
Bhima pressed him down to the earth with his knees and beat him with his
fists. The cracking of his back and the screaming of his voice filled
the whole forest. Baka then vomited blood and gave up his life force.
The friends of Baka were frightened, and Bhima commanded them, “Do not
kill human beings again, for if you do, you will die as Baka did. The
Rakshasas were terrified at Bhima's power, and from that day on, they
were seen by the inhabitants of that town to be very peaceful toward
mankind. Then Bhima dragged the lifeless corpse of the demon, placed him
on the city gate and went away unseen by anyone. The next morning the
citizens of Ekachakra saw the cannibal's mutilated body covered in blood.
“Mahabharata Summation”
Fourteenth Chapter of the Adi Parva,
Entitled: “The Cannibal Baka Slain”
http://philosophy.ru/library/asiatica/indica/itihasa/mahabharata/eng/gbmb01xt.html
Fourteenth Chapter of the Adi Parva,
Entitled: “The Cannibal Baka Slain”
http://philosophy.ru/library/asiatica/indica/itihasa/mahabharata/eng/gbmb01xt.html
Published by dasavatara das - "Vedic Views on World News"
http://www.vedicviews-worldnews.blogspot.com.ar/
http://www.vedicviews-worldnews.blogspot.com.ar/
No comments:
Post a Comment